Ford S-Max 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Ford S-Max and Ford C-Max have the same engine power, but Ford S-Max torque is 55 NM more than Ford C-Max. Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford S-Max consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 39 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 285 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2000 litres | 1684 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 316 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |