Ford S-Max 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Ford S-Max and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford S-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Ford S-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Ford S-Max is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford S-Max is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 285 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2000 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
| |