Ford S-Max 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014

 
Ford S-Max
2010 - 2015
Ford C-Max
2014 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 160 HP120 HP
Torque: 240 NM159 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds11.8 seconds
Ford S-Max is more dynamic to drive.
Ford S-Max engine produces 40 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 81 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.06.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.0 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford S-Max consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1220 km on highway1010 km on highway
770 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.38 m
Width: 1.88 m1.83 m
Height: 1.66 m1.63 m
Ford S-Max is larger.
Ford S-Max is 39 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 3 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 285 litres432 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 285 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2000 litres1684 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 316 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`4001`860
Safety:
Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low

average
Ford C-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 72009400
Pros and Cons: Ford S-Max has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Ford C-Max has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv