Ford S-Max 2019 vs Ford C-Max 2014
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 370 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Ford S-Max and Ford C-Max have the same engine power, but Ford S-Max torque is 30 NM less than Ford C-Max. Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.63 m | |
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 42 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 965 litres | 432 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2020 litres | 1684 litres | |
Ford S-Max has more luggage capacity. Ford S-Max has 533 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 336 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`555 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 18 400 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |