Ford S-Max 2019 vs Volkswagen Touran 2015
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford S-Max) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Volkswagen Touran), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Ford S-Max and Volkswagen Touran have the same engine power, but Ford S-Max torque is 140 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 10.50 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Touran can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Touran version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 27 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 700 litres | 834 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2200 litres | 1980 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford S-Max uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`220 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`827 kg | 1`620 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 523 kg | 600 kg | |
| Ford S-Max load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Volkswagen Touran. Therefore, Volkswagen Touran is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |