Ford S-Max 2006 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford S-Max engine produces 39 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.6 | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford S-Max consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ford C-Max 2007 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford C-Max 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 44 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 854 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 854 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 1620 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 480 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 4.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |