Ford S-Max 2006 vs Mazda 5 2008

 
Ford S-Max
2006 - 2010
Mazda 5
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 161 HP146 HP
Torque: 208 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds10.2 seconds
Ford S-Max engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Mazda 5. Despite the higher power, Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.77.9
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford S-Max consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 270 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway950 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.51 m
Width: 1.85 m1.76 m
Height: 1.66 m1.67 m
Ford S-Max is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford S-Max is 27 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Seats: 7 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 854 litres115 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 854 litres115 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2100 litres1566 litres
In 7-seat version Ford S-Max has more luggage space (by 739 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 534 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3402`125
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Ford S-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 5 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 36002600
Pros and Cons: Ford S-Max has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Mazda 5 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv