Ford S-Max 2015 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013

 
Ford S-Max
2015 - 2018
Citroen C4 Picasso
2013 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 350 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds10.4 seconds
Ford S-Max and Citroen C4 Picasso have the same engine power, but Ford S-Max torque is 10 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.44.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km6.2 l/100km
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford S-Max consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1290 km in combined cycle1300 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1440 km on highway
980 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.43 m
Width: 1.92 m1.83 m
Height: 1.66 m1.61 m
Ford S-Max is larger.
Ford S-Max is 37 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 5 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 285 litres537 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 285 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data537 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2020 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 1.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`590no data
Safety:
The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low

low
Ford S-Max has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen C4 Picasso, so Ford S-Max quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 11 40010 800
Pros and Cons: Ford S-Max has
  • has 4x4 drive
Citroen C4 Picasso has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv