Ford S-Max 2015 vs Seat Alhambra 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 210 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 450 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Ford S-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford S-Max engine produces 60 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Thanks to more power Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford S-Max consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
1370 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
880 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
Ford S-Max is 6 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 6 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 267 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 285 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 267 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2020 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`575 | 2`520 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Seat Alhambra is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | low | low | |
Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford S-Max, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 11 400 | 16 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |