Ford S-Max 2015 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford S-Max engine produces 60 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford S-Max consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 37 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 285 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2020 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 1.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`575 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |