Ford S-Max 2015 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford S-Max engine produces 55 HP more power than Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 42 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 285 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2020 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 1.1 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |