Ford S-Max 2015 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford S-Max engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford S-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford S-Max consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Ford S-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
| Ford S-Max is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 285 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 885 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2020 litres | 2297 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space (by 15 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Sharan (by 277 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`450 kg | 2`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`645 kg | 1`723 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 805 kg | 567 kg | |
| Ford S-Max load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem more than Volkswagen Sharan. Therefore, Ford S-Max is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
| |