Ford S-Max 2006 vs Mazda 5 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 - 220 HP | 110 - 146 HP | |
Torque: | 190 - 400 NM | 165 - 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 11.9 seconds | 10.2 - 13.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 9.7 | 6.1 - 8.3 | |
Ford S-Max petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 5. On average, Ford S-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
Ford S-Max is larger, but slightly lower. Ford S-Max is 27 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 854 litres | 115 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 1678 litres | |
Ford S-Max has more luggage capacity. Ford S-Max has 739 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 422 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`433 | ~ 2`176 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |