Ford S-Max 2006 vs Mazda 5 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford S-Max
2006 - 2010
Mazda 5
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 220 HP110 - 146 HP
Torque: 190 - 400 NM165 - 360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 - 11.9 seconds10.2 - 13.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.2 - 9.76.1 - 8.3
Ford S-Max petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 5. On average, Ford S-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.51 m
Width: 1.85 m1.76 m
Height: 1.66 m1.67 m
Ford S-Max is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford S-Max is 27 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 854 litres115 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2100 litres1678 litres
Ford S-Max has more luggage capacity.
Ford S-Max has 739 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 422 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`433~ 2`176
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 36002600
Pros and Cons: Ford S-Max has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Mazda 5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv