Ford S-Max 2006 vs Ford C-Max 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 220 HP | 90 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 400 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 11.9 seconds | 9.6 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 9.7 | 4.8 - 8.1 | |
|
Ford S-Max petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Ford S-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 43 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 854 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford S-Max has more luggage capacity. Ford S-Max has 304 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 480 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`433 | ~ 1`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 4.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |