Ford S-Max 2010 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 240 HP | 140 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 - 420 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 13 seconds | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.3 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Ford S-Max petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Ford S-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Ford S-Max is smaller. Ford S-Max is 8 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford S-Max is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2000 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Ford S-Max has 524 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Ford S-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`457 | ~ 2`337 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |