Ford S-Max 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 240 HP | 115 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 - 420 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 13 seconds | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.3 | 5.7 - 8.2 | |
|
Ford S-Max petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Ford S-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Ford S-Max is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford S-Max is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2000 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Ford S-Max has 105 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`457 | ~ 2`486 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |