Ford S-Max 2015 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford S-Max is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Sharan can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 140 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 450 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.1 seconds | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 7.9 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Ford S-Max petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Ford S-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
| Ford S-Max is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2020 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Ford S-Max has 524 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`543 | ~ 2`337 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |