Ford S-Max 2015 vs Ford C-Max 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford S-Max is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford C-Max can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 85 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 450 NM | 141 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.1 seconds | 8.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 7.9 | 3.8 - 6.5 | |
|
Ford S-Max petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Ford S-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 42 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 544 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2020 litres | 1684 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford S-Max has 259 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. This could mean that the Ford S-Max uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 336 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`543 | ~ 1`949 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |