Ford Ranger 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 3 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 10 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 44 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 975 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |