Ford Ranger 2006 vs Toyota RAV4 2001

 
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
Toyota RAV4
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 143 HP116 HP
Torque: 330 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds12.1 seconds
Ford Ranger engine produces 27 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.97.1
Real fuel consumption: 9.4 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Ranger consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 270 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres57 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway930 km on highway
740 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m4.20 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.75 m1.69 m
Ford Ranger is 88 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 1500 litres400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1150 litres
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity.
Ford Ranger has 1100 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4.
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`0701`930
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 74002800
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Toyota RAV4 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv