Ford Ranger 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 3 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 10 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 44 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 975 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`070 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |