Ford Ranger 2006 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Isuzu Rodeo) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 13 HP more power than Isuzu Rodeo, whereas torque is 135 NM more than Isuzu Rodeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.5 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu Rodeo, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 57 cm longer than the Isuzu Rodeo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 933 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2297 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 567 litres more trunk space than the Isuzu Rodeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`070 | 2`065 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
| |