Ford Ranger 2006 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 29 HP more power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 2.09 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.65 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 48 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 38 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 1903 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Ranger has 403 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. This could mean that the Ford Ranger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`070 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |