Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 330 NM | 373 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
Ford Ranger engine produces 27 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
740 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.87 m | |
Ford Ranger is 18 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 25 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 215 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 1285 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 7200 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |