Ford Ranger 2006 vs Nissan Navara 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 356 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 1 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.1 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller. Ford Ranger is 15 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`805 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Navara has
| |