Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger engine produces 7 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller. Ford Ranger is 11 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |