Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mazda CX-9 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 263 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 120 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 11.5 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda CX-9) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Ranger) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
| Ford Ranger and Mazda CX-9 are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 4 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2852 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |