Ford Ranger 2006 vs Ford Explorer 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 106 HP less power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 11.0 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.80 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 7 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 29 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 595 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 905 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |