Ford Ranger 2006 vs Dodge Durango 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 349 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 509 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 206 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 179 NM less than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 14.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 14.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 5.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 855 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller. Ford Ranger is 3 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Ranger has 968 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Durango. The Dodge Durango may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |