Ford Ranger 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2004

 
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
Honda CR-V
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 84 HP140 HP
Torque: 195 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.6 seconds
Ford Ranger engine produces 56 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 145 NM less than Honda CR-V.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data6.7
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres58 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking.

Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ...  More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m4.64 m
Width: 1.72 m1.78 m
Height: 1.63 m1.71 m
Ford Ranger is 44 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 1500 litres525 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data952 litres
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity.
Ford Ranger has 975 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V.
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`020no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 72003000
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • roomier boot
Honda CR-V has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv