Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 16 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi L 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 58 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`020 | 2`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |