Ford Ranger 2006 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 84 HP | 114 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 180 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Ford Ranger engine produces 30 HP less power than Chevrolet Blazer, but torque is 15 NM more than Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.60 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 2.09 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
Ford Ranger is 48 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 37 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 1903 litres | |
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Ranger has 403 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. This could mean that the Ford Ranger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`020 | 2`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7200 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |