Ford Ranger 2011 vs Ford Ranger 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 200 HP | |
Torque: | 470 NM | 470 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Ford Ranger 2011 and Ford Ranger 2012 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.36 m | 5.36 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.71 m | 1.82 m | |
Ford Ranger 2011 and Ford Ranger 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | 1210 litres | |
Ford Ranger 2011 has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger 2011 has 240 litres more trunk space than the Ford Ranger 2012. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 1`109 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 18 400 | 19 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
| |