Ford Ranger 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 4 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 10.1 | |
| Ford Ranger consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 82 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 925 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |