Ford Ranger 2011 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 94 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 99 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 10.0 | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 35 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1450 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2260 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |