Ford Ranger 2011 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 24 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 177 NM less than Nissan Navara. Despite less power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 8.3 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 14 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Ranger is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Ford Ranger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`805 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests, but Nissan Navara is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |