Ford Ranger 2011 vs Ford Ranger 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger 2011 is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger 2011 engine produces 16 HP more power than Ford Ranger 2012, but torque is 149 NM less than Ford Ranger 2012. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger 2011 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 8.5 | |
|
The Ford Ranger 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger 2011 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger 2011 could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger 2011 and Ford Ranger 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | 1210 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger 2011 has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger 2011 has 240 litres more trunk space than the Ford Ranger 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 1`144 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |