Ford Ranger 2011 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 128 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 127 NM less than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 11.2 | |
| Ford Ranger consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 229 mm (9 inches) | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 25 cm longer than the Dodge Durango, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1450 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.2 metres more than that of the Dodge Durango. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |