Ford Ranger 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Ranger is 72 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 925 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 2.1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |