Ford Ranger 2011 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 81 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 175 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Ranger is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Ford Ranger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests, but Nissan Navara is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |