Ford Ranger 2011 vs Audi Q7 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 90 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 175 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Ranger consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 229 mm (9 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 27 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 675 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.7 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |