Ford Ranger 2011 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Volkswagen Amarok. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 229 mm (9 inches) | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Amarok is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Ranger scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |