Ford Ranger 2011 vs Isuzu D-Max 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 14 HP more power than Isuzu D-Max, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Isuzu D-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Isuzu D-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Ranger is 33 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`650 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |