Ford Ranger 2012 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 31 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.0 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Ford Ranger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`109 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests, but Nissan Navara is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |