Ford Ranger 2012 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 375 NM | 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.0 | |
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`129 | 2`820 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Amarok is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Ranger scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 19 400 | 17 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |