Ford Ranger 2012 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012

Ford Ranger
2012 - 2015
Mitsubishi L 200
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.5 Diesel


Power: 150 HP136 HP
Torque: 375 NM314 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds17.8 seconds
Ford Ranger is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Ranger engine produces 14 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 61 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.48.7
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Ranger consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1000 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)


Length: 5.36 m5.00 m
Width: 1.85 m1.80 m
Height: 1.82 m1.78 m
Ford Ranger is larger.
Ford Ranger is 36 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 1210 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12.7 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1292`850
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 20 00011 200
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: