Ford Ranger 2012 vs Mercedes GL 2012

 
Ford Ranger
2012 - 2015
Mercedes GL
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP250 HP
Torque: 375 NM620 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds7.9 seconds
Mercedes GL is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Ranger engine produces 100 HP less power than Mercedes GL, whereas torque is 245 NM less than Mercedes GL. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.58.0
The Mercedes GL is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Ranger consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GL, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle1250 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway1330 km on highway
Mercedes GL gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.36 m5.12 m
Width: 1.85 m1.93 m
Height: 1.82 m1.85 m
Ford Ranger is 24 cm longer than the Mercedes GL, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm lower.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: 1210 litres680 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data680 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 1210 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2300 litres
Turning diameter: 12.7 meters12.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes GL.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1443`250
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 19 20024 000
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • lower price
Mercedes GL has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv