Ford Ranger 2012 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 375 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.9 | |
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`144 | 3`040 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Amarok is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Ranger scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 19 200 | 18 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |