Ford Ranger 2012 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 18 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`144 | 3`040 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Amarok is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Ranger scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |