Ford Ranger 2012 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 110 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, but torque is 50 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 10.0 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 35 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2260 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`144 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |